Professional Development

Author Archive

Open Access Week 2011 Wrap-up

Friday, November 4, 2011 2:53 pm

In recognition of Open Access Week 2011 (Oct. 24-28), I participated in three presentations over 4 weeks: 2 local, 1 online. To unofficially kick things off, I spoke on Oct. 6, along with Bill Kane, at the Thursdays at Byrum Center series on supporting scholarship. I spoke generally about why I do what I do, and specifically about what it is I do. Bill then shared about what it is that he is doing, which if you were at our Sept. staff meeting, you know (hint, hint it involves ISBNs).

My online presentation was on Monday afternoon during the official Open Access Week. I was one of three speakers (John Wilbanks and Heather Piwowar presented before me) giving a webinar for the Special Libraries Association on New Directions in Scholarly Communication, what STM librarians and other information professionals need to know about changes in the nature of scholarly publishing. John, former VP at Creative Commons, spoke about broad changes to scholarship, from creation to discovery. Heather, a postdoc with NESCent through the DataONE cyberinfrastructure project, spoke about the increasing importance of data management and discovery. I wrapped things up by offering a librarian’s perspective on the changes, and how they are impacting our ability to support scholarship creation at our institutions. (My slides are linked from the page above.)

To conclude Open Access Week celebrations, I gave a talk this past Wednesday, Nov. 2, on current copyright conflicts in academe. There was a small but lively crowd on hand to hear the latest on three different lawsuits (Georgia State copyright trial, AIME vs. UCLA, Author’s Guild vs. HathiTrust) and proposed legislation currently before Congress (PRTECT IP/SOPA/ePARASITES…really, I’m not making that last one up!). Great questions and heated debate ensued, illustrating just how complex the issues are surrounding these cases/legislation, and how profoundly they impact higher education.

All in all, I had a great time honoring the spirit of openness during these various Open Access Week activities, and am energized to continue advocating for change in scholarly communication!

Mentoring Program Coordinator Council

Friday, November 4, 2011 2:07 pm

On Thursday, November 3, Bobbie, Giz, Craig, and Molly attended the third campus-wide Mentoring Program Coordinator Council. Organized once each semester by Allison McWilliams, Director of the Mentoring Resource Center, the Council brings together the coordinators of various formal mentoring programs at Wake Forest. Programs include those involving peer-to-peer mentoring among undergraduates, professional mentoring matches with MA and MBA graduate students in the Schools of Business, and faculty to student mentoring through the Chaplain’s Office, as well as our own Librarian’s Assembly program.

The Council began with a discussion led by Evelyn Williams, who came to Wake Forest in August and holds multiple appointments across the Schools of Business, School of Medicine, and Office of Personal & Career Development, where she is Associate Vice President, Leadership Development. She spoke about the importance of harvesting emotional intelligence in mentoring relationships. The old adage that “nice guys finish last” is now being supplanted by data that backs up the claim that “nice does matter.” Being aware of how others perceive you, and how your actions impact others, is crucial to success, including in mentoring relationships. Effective mentoring relationships are ones where mentees are encouraged to develop their self-awareness and self-management skills, and where mentors and mentees interact across the continuum of behaviors from sounding board to feedback. Evelyn explained the IMPACT-feedback model, where impact stands for the manner in which feedback is given:

I=illustrative
M=empathetic
P=prescriptive
A=actionable
C=concise
T=timed appropriately

Just as with any relationship, time is needed to build trust in mentoring relationships. It is important for mentors to understand that they cannot and should not solve their mentees’ problems by launching the relationship in feedback-giving mode; rather, they need to seek the mentees’ permission to give feedback, as the mentee needs to feel comfortable enough with the relationship to be receptive. One way for mentors to help build comfort and trust with their mentees is to use stories and examples from their own personal experiences. Mentors should also think through the launch of the relationship, and find a balance between inquiry (really trying to understand) versus advocacy (problem-solving) based on cues from their mentees. After explaining how emotional intelligence and the IMPACT-feedback model work in mentoring, Evelyn then opened discussion to the group for assessment on how our various mentoring models can more effectively incorporate these strategies.

The second half of the Council included a period of updates from Allison on campus plans for National Mentoring Month (January 2012), new assistance measures for students studying abroad, lessons learned from the recent University of New Mexico Mentoring Institute, and upcoming development opportunities.

I believe I can speak for my fellow Mentoring Committee members when I say that I have found the two Councils we’ve been invited to attend to be quite beneficial, both in giving ideas for our own mentoring program and in making us aware off all the mentoring opportunities taking place around campus. We are quite fortunate to have Allison here at Wake Forest to serve as a resource and expert on mentoring, and all our programs are stronger as a result!

Molly “Emerged” at ALA

Friday, July 1, 2011 5:05 pm

Much of my ALA experience in New Orleans can be summarized in a list of “firsts”:
- first time at an ALA Annual conference (Midwinter was my first ALA anything!);
- first time presenting at a poster presentation (which I did twice!);
- first time attending a full ACRL Scholarly Communications Committee meeting (long (4 hours) but fascinating);
- first time the ACRL Scholarly Communication 101 Road Show program presenters met in person (for a very productive day-long curriculum planning retreat);
- first time touching an alligator (just a baby one…);
- first time eating a beignet (YUM);
- first time in NOLA (amazing).
As I continue to be involved with ALA and ACRL, I know that many of these firsts will be followed by seconds, thirds and so on, but happily they all combined this year for an overwhelmingly positive conference experience!

The most important reason I attended this ALA (and no, it wasn’t food-related, Facebook photos notwithstanding) was to complete my participation in the Emerging Leaders (EL) program. On Friday, our EL class had a morning leadership training and assessment session, followed by a lunch and “graduation” ceremony, then concluded the program with our afternoon poster session. The posters were outcomes of our six months’ project work, and I thought that all 16 teams did a great job designing interesting, engaging posters. As you might expect, there were a lot of QR codes around (our team used one), as well as Mardi Gras beads, buttons and other goodies to entice people to visit teams’ posters and learn more about our projects.

My EL project team (Team L) was tasked this past winter and spring with completing a webinar series feasibility study for the ALA Learning Round Table (LearnRT) board, which is launching a new Webinar Learning Series later this year. We began our research by identifying many webinar and e-learning series currently and previously in place, and then selecting 16 to assess on a number of criteria that included cost, timing, theme, platform, and promotion. After analyzing the collected data, we contacted organizers of 10 webinar series asking them to complete a detailed webinar assessment survey. The aim of the survey was to gain insight into elements of webinar series production that are less easily quantified or not publicly available (e.g., best practices, planning timelines, number of registrants or attendees, etc.). From the data we gathered and from that provided by the survey respondents (50% response rate), we drafted a report for the LearnRT board that outlines best practices, issues and implications for success, and recommendations for the new webinar series. We submitted our report to the LearnRT board prior to ALA, and several board members came to our poster session to thank us in person for doing a great job. If interested, you can read our report at our team’s ALA Connect page (and certainly ask me questions!).

As mentioned above, the EL poster session was just one of two I co-presented at ALA, but both involved our EL project poster. On Sunday afternoon, we rolled out our poster again at the annual LearnRT training showcase. Although we had lots of traffic and interest at Friday’s EL poster session, including Lauren P. and Steve, the folks we chatted with on Sunday were a more targeted audience, asking in-depth questions about our research and findings. I was very glad that LearnRT invited us to participate in the showcase, and look forward to the launch of the Webinar Learning Series as an outgrowth of our EL work.

Much of the rest of my ALA was spent at various scholarly communication-related presentations and meetings. The Road Show planning retreat was held on Thursday, the day before the conference started, so by the time Saturday morning rolled around, I’d already had two full days of activities. I did not slow much over the weekend, but fortunately didn’t have to dash between the convention center and hotels too often. I attended sessions covering library-university press partnerships, the Berlin Declaration on Open Access and the Berlin9 conference (to be held in the US for the first time this fall), and two on how best to advance scholarly communication and open access conversations on campuses. I was *thrilled* to attend one session on these issues sponsored by someone other than SPARC, the ACRL SC Committee, or the ALCTS SC Interest Group: on Monday morning, the ACRL Women and Gender Studies Section organized a panel addressing “21st Century Scholarly Communication: Conversation for Change.” I was very impressed by one panelist who unabashedly owned the failure of an open access journal she launched as a graduate student, as I believe that success and failure must be acknowledged, as both provide learning opportunities.

I’ve returned from ALA where I “emerged” officially, ate too much phenomenal food and became smitten with NOLA, but most importantly with lots of interesting ideas bouncing around my brain, not the least of which are some programming ideas for Open Access Week in October. Stay tuned!

At the Table at ACRL

Wednesday, April 6, 2011 10:16 am

As you’ve now realized, there was quite a ZSR contingent at the ACRL 2011 National Conference in Philadelphia last week. I was happily among them, enjoying my third ACRL conference and first real trip to Philly (airport connections don’t count). I arrived last Tuesday afternoon, and without a doubt, my overarching personal theme for this conference was “at the table”…and this is beyond all the great food I enjoyed!

My ACRL started Wednesday with a day-long curriculum planning retreat for the ARL-ACRL Institute on Scholarly Communication faculty. Although I am not an ISC faculty presenter, I was invited to attend the planning retreat as one of the ACRL SC 101 Road Show presenters. Being at the table with 13 others who are doing work similar to mine at various-sized institutions across North America was enlightening and energizing, and I’m still somewhat awed that I was asked to be at that table. After the retreat, I headed to the opening keynote address by filmmaker Tiffany Shlain. Although I cringed when she said that she now only looks online for archival footage for her documentaries, as I know there’s wonderful clips hidden away in archives worldwide, her perspective on accessibility and sharing were interesting. I also liked how she incorporated both video and still images into her slides. I completed my first day by meeting up with ZSR colleagues around three different tables in three different locations to share good food and great laughs.

Thursday found me at the table with several different vendors. My day started early with a SerialsSolutions vendor breakfast where I was introduced to Summon, a very cool search product that Roz discussed in her vendor post. I remember the early days of federated searching while in grad school, and while I could see the promise, the system I tried was clunky, ultimately proving frustrating for its inability to deliver the promise that was so clear. I was encouraged to see that Summon seems to solve those early problems. Feeling positive about vendors post-breakfast, I headed to the exhibit hall for a meeting with a BioMed Central representative to learn more about BMC institutional memberships and Springer’s open access initiatives – promising, but I’ll believe some of it only when I see it. After a disappointing morning session on virtues of “next gen” librarians – all of which I think should be virtues of any professional, regardless of age – and Roz’s fun Cyber Zed Shed session on QR codes, Mary Beth and I headed to an ebrary vendor luncheon to discuss ebooks. Conversation was honest, and driven primarily by suggestions from the librarians in attendance, although if ebrary plans to act on the desires expressed, they have a somewhat tall order ahead! My afternoon found me surveying tables in the Reading Market Terminal as I strolled through after lunch, catching up with a fellow Emerging Leader at a table at the back of the exhibit hall, and sitting on the floor behind a table at a maxed-out session on the Google Books Settlement. I did not hear anything new at the GBS discussion, but was encouraged by how many folks are actively engaged with digital access issues for in-copyright and orphaned books and picked up the Library Copyright Alliance’s updated GBS March Madness chart. My last official conference activity of the day was Raj Patel‘s awesome keynote, where I was thrilled to hear him acknowledging and championing the under-documented and uncompensated roles that women and girls play in our food economy. The evening’s events once again found me in the fun company of our ZSR colleagues, enjoying great food, Da Vinci’s brilliance, and fun music, sometimes on steps and sometimes around tables.

My Friday at ACRL was scholarly communication-intensive, with multiple sessions and conversations that touched upon the varied issues that fall under the broad SC umbrella. I was quite encouraged by the size of the crowd at an 8:30 session on why SC issues are important to non-ARL libraries. I had a very productive meeting around a tiny table at Old City Coffee with my co-presenter and one of our hosts for an upcoming Road Show in Minneapolis, after which Sarah (my co-presenter) and I headed to a three paper presentation on copyright lies retractions in biomedical publications, and the results of an SC survey. I nodded in agreement with many of the points raised by the authors of the paper on biomedical retractions, as they are a small but concerning problem. (Incidentally, this issue, especially how news media doesn’t always cover the retractions with nearly as much fanfare, is a great conversation starter for LIB 100 classes!) I also want to learn more about the copyright survey distributed to faculty and library staff at the University of Minnesota, as I’d be curious to see if a similar survey at WFU highlighted the same lies. My lunch was delayed in order to join a roundtable discussion on “Fostering a Culture of Sharing on Campus” that pulled together SC, copyright and institutional repository librarians for a fascinating conversation about engaging our faculty and students on SC issues. This roundtable led to an instructive spill-over conversation on the merits of copyright registration for ETDs, and the role of fair use and uncopyrightability of works reproduced within ETDs. Recharged after a late lunch and reflection break, I ended my SC-themed day at an invited paper, “Animating Archives: New Modes of Humanities Scholarship,” that had been commended by one of the ISC faculty at our retreat on Wednesday. Tara McPherson’s work is pushing the boundaries of what journals and books are and can be in digital forms, and I would love to see some of our WFU humanists involved in similar projects in the future. Following an ULS social, which was conveniently in a sports bar so I could easily keep tabs on the Opening Day baseball games (my beloved Red Sox have not started well, sigh), I ended Friday at the All Conference Reception at the National Constitution Center, where I eschewed both the museum exhibit and the table conversation in favor of twirling around the dance floor for a couple of hours!

Saturday’s tables all involved meals with ZSR colleagues as we wrapped up our ACRL experience and trekked home down I-95. Before leaving Philly, I managed one final trip to Reading Terminal Market for breakfast, a session on archiving considerations of born-digital materials, an intense monitoring of conference tweets (whereby I frustratingly realized that despite the interesting content of my session, I wish I’d been at the opposite end of the convention center in a different session…), and the closing keynote by Clinton Kelly, who was quite engaging…perhaps I should watch his show so I’ll be less out of the pop-culture loop?!

All in all, my ACRL experience was energizing, sending me home with new perspectives and ideas. Interestingly, there were fewer blatantly overarching SC sessions, which leads me to speculate – and hope! – that SC issues, which range from publishing to archiving to digital exploration to copyright law to innovation, are assimilating as fundamental issues around which enough interest has been built to require more targeted, specific sessions on the myriad aspects. If so, that would certainly echo and reinforce much of the conversation at the table where my ACRL began.

Molly at ScienceOnline 2011

Friday, January 28, 2011 6:09 pm

Two weeks ago, fresh on the heels of Midwinter, I hit the road again for yet another conference – ScienceOnline 2011. Fortunately SciO11 only had me traveling as far as the Sigma Xi headquarters in Research Triangle Park, where I spent the weekend learning about and debating the latest in the intersection of science, scholarship, blogging, openness, data, access, and a myriad of issues in between! You can see from the program page that there were a wide range of topics, and I attended sessions on everything from digital toolbox needs to open science to altmetrics to citations to blogging in the academy to ebooks in science.

This was my fourth year attending ScioO, but the first time I’ve been courageous enough to co-moderate a session. SciO follows an unconference format, and sessions are proposed and evolve on the conference wiki in the months leading up to the conference. After several well-organized but poorly attended librarian-led sessions at previous SciOs, when a group of SciO librarian veterans started brainstorming a topic for this year, we quickly concluded that we: a) needed to stay far away from the “L” word, and b) should partner with non-librarians (we’re the decided minority at SciO, not even achieving 10% representation; my first year, I think there were just 3 of us!).

So, Saturday morning, Kiyomi Deards (librarian), Steve Koch (scientist), and I led a session on “Data Discoverability: Institutional Support Strategies.” Although we initially thought that the conversation would center on how various university constituencies should collaborate to support the new NSF data management plan requirement, it steered in a broader direction, and Kiyomi and I spent some time discussing the current and possible future roles institutional repositories might play in data management support beyond NSF needs. As is wanted at SciO, the conversation took life among the participants, so being a co-moderator was not stressful. We had a full room (39 + the livestreaming video guys – so glad I didn’t know in advance we’d be livestreamed!), with tough questions and concerns being raised from all sides, and some very cool what-ifs being proposed for discovery app layers for IRs. I felt it was a very successful session, and I greatly appreciated the numerous non-librarians in the room who either defended the need for librarians to be involved in data management discussions or praised the librarians at their institutions with whom they’ve collaborated.

One interesting development this year: the sometimes heated debates about open access from previous SciOs was notably absent, with more discussion centering around the need to make data and the research process open. While I know this doesn’t mean that OA has been universally accepted by SciO attendees, it did give me hope that, at least for this group, that battle has been won – if you aren’t willing to make publications available, you likely wouldn’t be debating the merits of making the science and data *behind* them available.

All in all, the conversations, both in sessions and around Sigma Xi, were engaging and energizing; catching up with old friends and meeting new ones was fun; and SciO11 proved yet again that this is one of the best conferences I attend!

Molly’s Midwinter

Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:38 am

My first Midwinter – also my first ALA conference experience – has been quite an adventure! Things kicked off Thursday evening with an unofficial dinner with about 30 of my fellow Emerging Leaders at a Thai restaurant in the Gaslamp Quarter in San Diego. I was grateful to have a casual setting in which to make connections, including with two of the other NC ELs and two of my project teammates. In addition to giving me evening plans my first night in a new city (always welcome), I also went into Friday’s day-long EL session more at ease since I knew many names and faces.

Friday’s Emerging Leaders training and planning session was informative and exciting. The EL program is designed to prepare new professionals for future leadership in ALA and its Divisions, and to that end we heard from several ALA “bigwigs” – Leslie Berger (the former president who launched EL), Molly Raphael (President Elect), and Keith Fiels (Executive Director) – about their experiences. All were inspiring and reassuring that the behemoth that is ALA is not impenetrable, and will become more manageable and personal as the 60,000+ cloud of ALA members condenses to friends and colleagues with whom we will have connection for the rest of our careers. They also encouraged us to question the status quo as we become more involved, as it is up to us (all of us!) to make ALA what we want it to be. We also received leadership training from Maureen Sullivan during which she deftly drew upon the ELs’ own experiences to help us identify principles and practices of strong leadership.

Beyond preparing us for future ALA leadership through inspiration and training, the EL program also prepares us for committee work by placing us on projects sponsored by ALA committees, round tables and Divisions. I am working on a project sponsored by the Learning Round Table (LearnRT) examining the feasibility of an ongoing webinar series. During the next six months, my teammates and I will assess current and previous webinar series, draft a report for LearnRT, and design a poster that we will present at Annual in NOLA on Friday, June 24. In a somewhat surprising circumstance, the five of us working on this project are all academic librarians, but the membership of LearnRT seems to lean more public than academic. It will be a good challenge for us to be cognizant of the different perspectives and needs of public librarians as we complete our project.

Following the EL training day, I dropped by the LearnRT Meet & Greet to introduce myself to the chair and members, then headed back to the hotel to catch up with Susan, Roz, Carolyn and Erik for a reunion dinner at yet another Thai restaurant in the Gaslamp. After dinner and a stop by Heavenly Cupcakes, where we bumped into Lauren C., I headed to the EL reception held in the President Elect’s suite at the headquarters hotel. If Molly Raphael’s suite is any indication, being ALA President definitely has its perks when it comes to conference housing! The EL reception was great fun, as I had the chance to meet more ELs as well as Past President Camila Alire, but my class of ELs might have taken the boundary-pushing encouragement too far, as we were so loud security threatened to shut us down. Talk about busting the quiet librarian stereotype!

Saturday and Sunday were overwhelmingly devoted to attending various scholarly communication-related sessions, including the ALCTS Scholarly Communication Discussion Group, the SPARC-ACRL Forum, the ACRL Scholarly Communications Committee Meeting, and the ACRL Scholarly Communications Discussion Group. All were quite informative, reassuring me that we are on the right track at WFU, and I happily reconnected with several of my fellow ACRL Scholarly Communication 101 Road Show faculty, whom I have not seen in person since the last ACRL conference in March 2009. I also attended the Washington Office’s Saturday morning panel on ebooks, where an over-full room had lots of difficult, detailed questions for the three experts: Brewster Kahle, Sue Polanka, and Tom Peters. I bumped into Steve on Sunday afternoon, and we went to hear the conversation between Nancy Pearl and Neil Gaiman, which was wonderful. Dinner both nights was spent in the company of various ZSR colleagues, with the welcome inclusion of Bill Kane (ZSR colleague by extension) Sunday evening.

For my final Midwinter day, I attended a book talk breakfast to which I’d received an invitation through the EL program, and took an extended tour of the vendor floor. I also attended three other vendor meals throughout the weekend, where I heard great speakers and met friendly librarians, including a former colleague of Carolyn and Erik’s from Pfeiffer and another who used to live in Winston-Salem where she worked as a school media specialist.

Of all my experiences, the most impacting was the frequency with which I bumped into people I knew. Be they ZSR colleagues (Wanda and Lauren P., sorry I never saw you!), fellow ELs, Road Show faculty, or librarians I met throughout Midwinter, I repeatedly spotted known faces, underscoring the point made at Friday’s EL session that although large, ALA truly can be personal. And the personal is professionally very satisfying and reassuring to me as I launch farther into ALA involvement!

Scholarly Communication & Liaison Outreach

Tuesday, September 21, 2010 5:44 pm

Today Molly and Mary Beth (and for a while, Lauren C.) watched the ARL-ACRL Institute on Scholarly Communication webinar, “Broader Library Involvement in Building Scholarly Communication Programs.” The goal of the webinar was share examples and provide ideas for institutions who wish to involve liaisons in scholarly communication (SC) outreach across campus. This webinar was a good follow-up to the ideas I shared at the August liaison meeting. The three presenters were Karen Williams, University of Minnesota; Mike Furlough, Penn State; and Doug Way, Green Valley State University.

The main take-away points were:

  • Part of liaisons’ SC outreach efforts should be framed by the question, “What do we do in libraries to help make faculty active in broader, global research communities?”; our faculty are collaborating with researchers at other institutions world-wide, and we should identify how we can support them
  • Institutional ownership for SC issues is essential; cannot be library-owned or -only
  • At UMN, the library has partnered with the research office to design librarian-taught courses for faculty that fulfill government funding agencies’ Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training requirement
  • Arranging a forum for faculty editors to come together at your institution to discuss publishing issues and concerns with SC and collection development staff
  • Emphasize the service an institutional repository supports, not the repository itself
  • Saying “No, we can’t really help with…” will serve us better in the long run than trying to take on supporting new services that go beyond our abilities, boundaries
  • Ultimately challenge will be answering questions of “Who cares? Why are you doing this when you can’t provide me all the journals I want?”
  • Liaison support for SC issues will vary from discipline to discipline

All in all, it was a worthwhile webinar in that it generated new ideas, and confirmed others that have been percolating. Liaisons, stay tuned for more SC outreach info!

New Faculty Orientation

Monday, August 16, 2010 12:02 pm

Disclaimer: I felt a little odd going through new faculty orientation (NFO) last week, seeing as I’ve been at ZSR for over 10 months , and with the University for almost 4 years , but I’m not complaining! I had a lot of fun, really enjoyed the opportunity to meet our new colleagues, and have been pleasantly surprised at how much I learned.

One of the highlights from NFO Day 1 was hearing the Provost’s “Top 10 List for Success” for new faculty:

  1. Find mentors
  2. Form bonds with peers
  3. Get out there – network in your profession, be bold!
  4. Protect research time and explain it to students
  5. Give yourself deadlines
  6. Don’t be a summer scholar
  7. Find your own style in the classroom
  8. Be conscious of the responsibility that goes with your position
  9. Respect your students and treat them fairly
  10. Have high expectations

As a member of the Mentoring Committee, I was especially pleased to hear that Provost Tiefenthaler’s number one piece of advice for success was to find a mentor. She and several of the Associate Provosts affirmed the benefits gained from mentoring, and although the University does not have a structured mentoring program for new faculty, it is obvious that such relationships are highly valued. I also appreciated her encouragement to attend conferences and accept all speaking invitations to network in our professions.

Following the ZSR orientation session (kudos to my fellow presenters!), I enjoyed meeting with the new faculty in one of my liaison depts. (Math), and even gave a brief tour into the bowels of Reynolds Wing before lunch!

NFO Day 2 was all about benefits, and while I didn’t learn anything new (or need to sign up for benefits), I was able to put names and faces together of folks in HR and other campus depts.

NFO Day 3 was an all day orientation for Wake Forest College faculty. Although ZSR faculty aren’t part of the College, we were invited to attend and I sincerely hope that the invitation continues to be extended in the future, as I found this to be the most beneficial part of NFO. After an introduction to the depts. and staff within the Dean’s Office, there were a series of panels where existing College faculty shared their insights on the teacher-scholar ideal; managing self, life & work; and “the first year” faculty experience at WFU. While ZSR faculty aren’t evaluated as teacher-scholars and have different demands on our time, the panelists had good insights that apply across the board, and hearing their advice and experiences provided wonderful insight into what it means to be a teacher-scholar at Wake Forest.

Teacher-Scholar Ideal: Cindy Gendrich (Theatre & Dance), Ellen Miller (Anthropology), Jason Parsley (Math)

  • you’re going to fall down on one or the other, teaching or research, some semesters; it’s OK, you’ll rebound
  • perception of others not working as hard as you are isn’t true; just working through a different process
  • everyone wants you to do well – you aren’t pushing against a brick wall!
  • push students’ boundaries to have those “aha!” moments
  • not good if you’re feeling too comfortable because it likely means you aren’t pushing yourself

Managing Self, Life & Work: Christa Colyer (Chemistry), Susan Fahrbach (Biology), Jarrod Whitaker (Religion)

  • consistently attain success in work, self & relationships
  • it’s NOT a mathematical balance
  • they are ideals, you cannot reach them but you can come close
  • our jobs are inherently spontaneous; we have so many opportunities for engagement, so don’t think of them as “wasted time;” we are part of the University community and we are richer for engaging
  • problems of work-life balance, while experienced personally, almost always originate structurally or institutionally; the goal is to build structures within which we can honestly excel
  • life is dynamic and balance is overrated – life would be boring if balance was actually achieved!
  • don’t strive for balance over a period of days, weeks or months, but over a year; HOWEVER, don’t let the unbalance go unexplained to either side (work or life)
  • you don’t have to sacrifice everything to be a good WFU professor; learn to protect your family time because that is the most important thing

“The First Year”: Susan Harlan (English), Oana Jureschu (Physics), Will Walldorf (Political Science)

  • tell students you don’t check email after x-time (even though we know you do!), as you need to set boundaries
  • be reasonable in expectations of self
  • you cannot fool students if you don’t have passion for teaching or for the subject
  • stick to deadlines in syllabus and don’t make compromises; if you find a problem, change it in future classes
  • give grant proposals, manuscripts to colleagues to read prior to submission
  • academia is not a 9-5 job and it can get overwhelming; it takes time to develop structure, personal practices
  • our job is to explore everyday – that’s really cool!

I am very glad that I was able to participate in NFO, and will strongly encourage future new ZSR faculty to do so, regardless of how long they’ve been here when August rolls around!

Metrolina Information Literacy Conference

Friday, June 18, 2010 11:37 am

Yesterday I attended the Metrolina Library Association 5th Annual Information Literacy Conference. As Roz noted, ZSR was well represented by both attendees and presenters (Carolyn, Bobbie, Ellen, Mary S., Roz, and I), and I enjoyed catching up with colleagues from both ZSR and my UNCG days, as well as make new acquaintances during breaks. Being a smaller conference enabled good connections and conversation throughout the day, but the small size did not mean that the presenters had small impact – quite the contrary, especially for me, still new to IL instruction!

Dr. Clara M. Chu, chair of the LIS department at UNCG, opened the conference with her keynote, “Information Literacy Examined in Multicultural Context.” She made the point that multicultural literacy embraces both information literacy and critical literacy in knowledge of cultures and languages, and pointed out that problems arise when we think that one difference is better than another. She also noted that we need to be aware of positionality: recognizing what we bring to the table (e.g., socio-demographics, cultural characteristics, language). We need to teach our students to look at information from critical, multicultural perspectives, and practice reflexive ethics. We also need to be aware of identifying counter-narratives or alternatives to the dominant discourse. As WFU’s student body continues to diversify, I believe that there will be increasing opportunities to discuss multicultural literacy in LIB100 courses.

The first breakout session I attended was a presentation by Joe Eshleman, Johnson & Wales University-Charlotte, focusing on strategies and content to use in IL instruction that helps emphasize the significance of IL to students’ futures. Students need to understand that whether they know it or not, they apply principles of IL whenever they look for information, be it on which cell phone to purchase to which resource will help with their paper. They’ve done it, they do it, and they’ll continue to do it! I have a lot of scribbled margin notes with ideas that the discussion from this session sparked for future LIB100 use that will hopefully help students see past IL as library/education-only to real-life applicability.

After a delicious lunch (thank you, culinary institute food services!), Roz and I gave our presentation on using documentary films in an IL class. Participants seemed genuinely interested in our approach, and we had great questions and suggestions that fueled conversation. And although it wasn’t technically part of our presentation, Roz discussed our faculty status and I shared insights on IL instruction as a new instructor, two tangential topics that were of interest to many in the room.

The final breakout session I attended was specifically for new instructors, which seemed like the perfect place to end my day. Donna Gunter and Stephanie Otis from UNCC created a survival guide of best practices for new instructors. Partnering with Roz to teach LIB100 this past spring, and tagging along on several BI sessions for FYS during the winter, gave me a good grounding in survival tactics for IL instruction, and this session confirmed much of what I already knew. However, I still came away with ideas for classroom management, and the reminder that we cannot teach all of them all things but we can provide a solid grounding (always good to hear!).

All in all, my first immersion into an IL conference was thought-provoking and fun, and I would definitely return to the Metrolina conference in the future!

“Beyond Impact Factor” Panel at UNC

Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:13 pm

On Wednesday, June 9, I participated in the “Beyond Impact Factor: Understanding & Supporting Scholarly Work in the New Academy” presentation at UNC-Chapel Hill. Sponsored by the University Libraries Scholarly Communications Committee, five speakers presented various aspects of how changes in scholarly practice and scholarship are – or are not, as is often the case – being recognized within the academy, particularly through tenure and promotion review.

Dean Gary Marchionini, School of Information and Library Science (SILS), framed the day by giving an overview of what we mean when we talk about scholarly work (creating, teaching and serving), the new academy (changes in both forms of expression and institutional structures), and impact (rewarding, attributing and assessing). As news of the University of California and Nature Publishing Group controversy had broken the evening before, participants were keenly aware of how issues that formerly had been understood as fine-grain, library-level problems are increasingly becoming big problems for scholarship. Dean Marchionini concluded by sharing an example of how SILS is trying to measure the impact of dissertation advising by faculty through the MPACT project.

Kevin Smith, Duke University’s Scholarly Communication Officer, next spoke on owning scholarship, and how new forms of scholarship are challenging ownership conventions. Mr. Smith asserted that it will most likely be these new forms of scholarship – online courses, blogging, and digital visualization projects – more so than open access that are going to push tenure reform, as the usual tools for assessing value and impact do not apply. He concluded by promoting the use of Creative Commons licenses for digital scholarship, as attribution will continue to be far more important to scholars than copyright ownership.

Erin O’Meara, UNC’s Electronic Records Archivist, then showcased the Carolina Digital Repository (CDR), UNC’s institutional repository. Under development for close to 5 years, the CDR was pre-soft launched in April. The University Libraries, SILS faculty, and interested UNC faculty have been the core collaborators on the project. One of the strengths of the CDR is the strong collaborative approach taken between technologists and curators to build the repository. Ms. O’Meara acknowledged that there are challenges ahead, some known (meeting actual needs vs. perceived needs) and some unknown, but she believes that the focus on preservation of scholarly output, born-digital special collections, and University records will provide a stable framework within which future problems can be solved successfully.

Following the first break out session, Support for New Forms of Access, I spoke on blogging as scholarship. You can read more about my thoughts in a forthcoming “Future Of” blog post, but the crux of my argument is this: blogging has changed dramatically, not only since its genesis in the late 1990′s, but even within the last five years since the Chronicle of Higher Education published an article titled, “Bloggers Need Not Apply,” and the contributions to scholarship via blogging merit recognition. Although there are problems with evaluating contributions via blogging, the rise of vetted blogging communities (ScienceBlogs) and the evolution of publications via blogs/blogging platforms (In the Library with the Lead Pipe) point to the rising value of blogs as an outlet for scholarship.

Phillip Edwards, SILS instructor, then spoke about experiences coordinating faculty awareness and support surrounding scholarly communication practices at UNC. Through two studies completed by SILS students, and one currently underway with UNC librarians, Mr. Edwards has been assessing open access awareness, open access citation effect, and open access fund application across the campus. He shared data collected through the studies in a series of tables (I’ve got a copy in my office, if anyone is interested), and posed two questions – 1. At the campus-level, how can programs and services be designed to effectively support faculty and students in their writing and publishing practices?; 2. What else might we need to know about publishing practices at UNC in order to address this question? – to launch us in to the second (and final) break out session, Support for New Forms of Scholarship.

Conversations during break out sessions were informative and enlightening, and good questions challenging the assumptions of the speakers sparked thoughtful debate. Although the audience was predominantly from UNC, including several SILS students, all four tobacco road universities were represented. I had a lot of fun returning to my alma mater to speak about a thought-provoking topic, and thoroughly enjoyed having my opinions challenged and expanded through the day’s events!


Pages
About
Categories
2007 ACRL Baltimore
2007 ALA Annual
2007 ALA Gaming Symposium
2007 ALA Midwinter
2007 ASERL New Age of Discovery
2007 Charleston Conference
2007 ECU Gaming Presentation
2007 ELUNA
2007 Evidence Based Librarianship
2007 Innovations in Instruction
2007 Kilgour Symposium
2007 LAUNC-CH Conference
2007 LITA National Forum
2007 NASIG Conference
2007 North Carolina Library Association
2007 North Carolina Serials Conference
2007 OCLC International ILLiad Conference
2007 Open Repositories
2007 SAA Chicago
2007 SAMM
2007 SOLINET NC User Group
2007 UNC TLT
2007_ASIST
2008
2008 Leadership Institute for Academic Librarians
2008 ACRL Immersion
2008 ACRL/LAMA JVI
2008 ALA Annual
2008 ALA Midwinter
2008 ASIS&T
2008 First-Year Experience Conference
2008 Lilly Conference
2008 LITA
2008 NASIG Conference
2008 NCAECT
2008 NCLA RTSS
2008 North Carolina Serials Conference
2008 ONIX for Serials Webinar
2008 Open Access Day
2008 SPARC Digital Repositories
2008 Tri-IT Meeting
2009
2009 ACRL Seattle
2009 ALA Annual
2009 ALA Annual Chicago
2009 ALA Midwinter
2009 ARLIS/NA
2009 Big Read
2009 code4lib
2009 Educause
2009 Handheld Librarian
2009 LAUNC-CH Conference
2009 LAUNCH-CH Research Forum
2009 Lilly Conference
2009 LITA National Forum
2009 NASIG Conference
2009 NCLA Biennial Conference
2009 NISOForum
2009 OCLC International ILLiad Conference
2009 RBMS Charlottesville
2009 SCLA
2009 UNC TLT
2010
2010 ALA Annual
2010 ALA Midwinter
2010 ATLA
2010 Code4Lib
2010 EDUCAUSE Southeast
2010 Handheld Librarian
2010 ILLiad Conference
2010 LAUNC-CH Research Forum
2010 LITA National Forum
2010 Metrolina
2010 NASIG Conference
2010 North Carolina Serials Conference
2010 RBMS
2010 Sakai Conference
2011 ACRL Philadelphia
2011 ALA Annual
2011 ALA Midwinter
2011 CurateCamp
2011 Illiad Conference
2012 SNCA Annual Conference
ACRL
ACRL 2013
ACRL New England Chapter
ACRL-ANSS
ACRL-STS
ALA Annual
ALA Annual 2013
ALA Editions
ALA Midwinter
ALA Midwinter 2012
ALA Midwinter 2014
ALCTS Webinars for Preservation Week
ALFMO
APALA
ARL Assessment Seminar 2014
ARLIS
ASERL
ASU
Audio streaming
authority control
Berkman Webinar
bibliographic control
Book Repair Workshops
Career Development for Women Leaders Program
CASE Conference
cataloging
Celebration: Entrepreneurial Conference
Charleston Conference
CIT Showcase
CITsymposium2008
Coalition for Networked Information
code4lib
commons
Conference Planning
Conferences
Copyright Conference
costs
COSWL
CurateGear 2013
CurateGear 2014
Designing Libraries II Conference
DigCCurr 2007
Digital Forsyth
Digital Humanities Symposium
Disaster Recovery
Discovery tools
E-books
EDUCAUSE
Educause SE
EDUCAUSE_SERC07
Electronic Resources and Libraries
Embedded Librarians
Entrepreneurial Conference
ERM Systems
evidence based librarianship
FDLP
FRBR
Future of Libraries
Gaming in Libraries
General
GODORT
Google Scholar
govdocs
Handheld Librarian Online Conference
Hurricane Preparedness/Solinet 3-part Workshop
ILS
information design
information ethics
Information Literacy
innovation
Innovation in Instruction
Innovative Library Classroom Conference
Inspiration
Institute for Research Design in Librarianship
instruction
IRB101
Journal reading group
Keynote
LAMS Customer Service Workshop
LAUNC-CH
Leadership
Learning spaces
LibQUAL
Library 2.0
Library Assessment Conference
Library of Congress
licensing
Lilly Conference
LITA
LITA National Forum
LOEX
LOEX2008
Lyrasis
Management
Marketing
Mentoring Committee
MERLOT
metadata
Metrolina 2008
MOUG 09
MOUG 2010
Music Library Assoc. 07
Music Library Assoc. 09
Music Library Assoc. 2010
NASIG
National Library of Medicine
NC-LITe
NCCU Conference on Digital Libraries
NCICU
NCLA
NCLA Biennial Conference 2013
NCPC
NCSLA
NEDCC/SAA
NHPRC-Electronic Records Research Fellowships Symposium
NISO
North Carolina Serial Conference 2014
Offsite Storage Project
OLE Project
online catalogs
online course
OPAC
open access
Peabody Library Leadership Institute
plagiarism
Podcasting
Preservation
Preservation Activities
Preserving Forsyth LSTA Grant
Professional Development Center
rare books
RDA/FRBR
Reserves
RITS
RTSS 08
RUSA-CODES
SAA Class New York
SAMM 2008
SAMM 2009
Scholarly Communication
ScienceOnline2010
Social Stratification in the Deep South
Social Stratification in the Deep South 2009
Society of American Archivists
Society of North Carolina Archivists
SOLINET
Southeast Music Library Association
Southeast Music Library Association 08
Southeast Music Library Association 09
SPARC webinar
subject headings
Sun Webinar Series
tagging
TALA Conference
Technical Services
technology
ThinkTank Conference
Training
ULG
Uncategorized
user studies
Vendors
video-assisted learning
visual literacy
WakeSpace
Web 2.0
Webinar
WebWise
WFU China Initiative
Wikis
Women's History Symposium 2007
workshops
WSS
ZSR Library Leadership Retreat
Tags
Archives
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007

Powered by WordPress.org, protected by Akismet. Blog with WordPress.com.