Professional Development

Assessment in Libraries Conference

Monday, October 25, 2010 11:00 pm

The 2010 Library Assessment Conference themed, Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment, is the third in a series of planned conferences devoted to building an assessment culture and community within libraries. Held every two years, the conference is co-sponsored by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL), the University of Virginia and the University of Washington. This years’ conference attendance was capped at 460 with almost as many waitlisted. The 2012 conference will return back to the University of Virginia, home of the first conference.

This morning’s opening session featured Fred Heath from the University of Texas, who gave an overview of the major library assessment initiatives over the past century. From its chaotic beginnings to its adoption by ARL, assessment efforts continue to improve. Heath paid tribute to several pioneers, acknowledging significant contributions down through the years.

“Are They Learning? Are We? Learning Outcomes & the Academic Library,” was the selected topic given by the second opening keynoter, Megan Oakleaf. According to Oakleaf, librarians face a new assessment challenge. We must demonstrate the impact of academic libraries on student learning. Librarians should begin the process with a list of desired outcomes. These outcomes should describe what they want students to learn and then how this intersects with institutional and departmental goals. Oakleaf suggest the following six questions are most relevant to the assessment challenges faced by librarians today. 1) How committed are librarians to student learning? 2) What do librarians want students to learn? 3) How do librarians document student learning? 4) How committed are librarians to their learning? 5) What do librarians need to learn? 6) How can librarians document their own learning?

The afternoon sessions were ninety minutes long and featured three different presenters, each giving brief overviews. The first of these shared a focus on the use of rubrics in the assessment process. UNCG’s Kathy Crowe used a rubric to score worksheets used within a Communication Studies upper level course. This department had a long standing relationship with the library, but faculty members continued to be frustrated with the quality or resources selected and the student’s poor citation skills. As a result of the worksheet scores, changes were implemented that resulted in dramatically improved performance.

The third session entitled “But What Did They Learn? What Classroom Assessment Can Tell You about Student Learning,” compared typical course evaluations with a classroom assessment technique called the “minute paper.” Common techniques tend to reveal if students are satisfied with the classroom instruction, but rarely do they reveal what the student learned. The “minute paper” approach asks two questions. 1) Name one useful thing you learned? 2) Name one thing you’re still confused on?

The second parallel session I attended focused more on general academic library assessment. I was most impressed with the University of Mississippi’s campus wide assessment program. This program required all campus units to submit biannual reports which have to include at least three objectives with multiple means of assessment for each objective. The program also requires that the campus unit develop changes to their operations based on the assessment. The program specifically prohibits lack of funding as a rationale for not making necessary improvements.

Unlike most conferences, planners carved out tonight for dinner and poster sharing. I found this approach very nice. I was able to view the eighty plus posters with ease, have several meaningful conversations with colleagues and enjoy a splendid dinner buffet. I’ll share more later.


4 Responses to “Assessment in Libraries Conference”

  1. So far, so good! Thanks for the first report.

  2. The “minute paper” sounds like the “fuzziest point” that Sarah and I have used in Lib 220. It is an easy way to determine what you have managed to get them to learn and what you still need to spend time on. Thanks, Wanda. I think the Assessment Committee has its work cut out for it.

  3. Yes, I think Lauren P. uses the minute paper technique as well. I know we’ll be interested in anything you bring back about assessing student learning that we might consider when establishing our own assessment processes.

  4. Thanks so much for this great overview and thoughtful synopses. For me the hardest part of programmatic assessment is the development of appropriate metrics — ones that tell you what you really want to know and that aren’t so cumbersome that one resents the measurement process. I bet you got some good ideas.

Professional Development
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007

Powered by, protected by Akismet. Blog with